Employees Declining Relocation

For the past six years, family issues/ties has taken the top spot among reasons for declined relocations, while spouse/partner employment has held second place. The impact of housing/mortgage concerns has lessened notably during this period. Dual-income households with family commitments continues to be a prime reason for declined relocations.

  • Near its lowest point in more than 15 years, housing/mortgage concerns remains within pre-recession levels for the fourth time since 2007 and for the third year in a row across company size. However, one in four firms indicated it still played a role in their employees’ decisions to stay put.
  • Family issues/ties continues to take the top spot among firms of all sizes, although it nearly ties with spouse/partner employment among small firms. It was cited more often by mid-size and large firms than by small firms (60% and 63% vs. 50%).
  • Spouse/partner employment remains near the highest levels recorded since the turn of the century. Its impact had fallen to 39% in 2011, likely due to the Great Recession’s effect on employment opportunities; it retains a 14% gain over this low (53%).

When asked about the number of employees declining relocation in 2018:


EMPLOYEES DECLINING RELOCATION

Employee reluctance in 2018 rose above post-recession levels (26% vs. 11%-18% during 2010-2013) after trending lower last year (18%) and is closer to the previous three years (2014: 28%; 2015: 22%; 2016: 20%) and the highs of 2008 (28%) and 2009 (29%). While more than a tenth of firms across sizes saw reluctance decrease last year, it appears the pressure to decline offers experienced a slight uptick overall, even as organizations worked to secure talent in the right locations.

Slightly more small firms (46% vs. 39% in 2017) saw employees decline relocation last year, jumping closer to 2015-2016 levels (48% & 55%) and above historical norms. Increased reluctance also jumped above previous recessionary levels for small firms (26% vs. 15%-19%). Increased reluctance at mid-size firms also rose notably over the prior year (32% vs. 20%), moving above the 2014-2015 level (30%) and over the recessionary ranges (20%-30%) for the previous four years. However, even though increased reluctance among large firms is elevated (18%) compared to 2016 (12%), it remains markedly lower than recessionary levels (40%+), similar to 2017 (19%), and within post-recession recovery ranges (7%-21%).

6 out of 10 firms saw employees decline relocation last year, in the mid-range historically.

 
Question 6
Chart Q6
-- click to enlarge --
Question 7
Chart Q7
-- click to enlarge --
Question 9
Chart Q9
-- click to enlarge --
Question 9-a1
Chart Q9-a1
-- click to enlarge --
Question 9-a2
Chart Q9-a2
-- click to enlarge --
We use cookies for several reasons, including keeping our sites reliable and secure, personalizing content, providing social media features, analyzing site usage, and for marketing purposes.

Click here to configure the cookie level that will be stored. Español